Thursday, February 28, 2019

Supreme Court Land Mark Judgment – Now PF is applicable on basic salary plus all allowances.


Supreme Court Land Mark Judgment – Now PF is applicable on basic salary plus all allowances.

CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6221 OF 2011

THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUNDCOMMISSIONER (II) WEST BENGAL         ...APPELLANT(S)  

VERSUS

VIVEKANANDA VIDYAMANDIR AND OTHERS    ...

RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3965 3966 OF 2013

S URYA ROSHNI LTD.  ...APPELLANT(S)

                                          VERSUS

E MPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND AND OTHERS                                  ...RESPONDENT(S)

FACTS OF THE CASE

The appellants with the exception of Civil Appeal No. 6221 of   2011,   are   establishments   covered   under   the Employees’ Provident   Fund   and   Miscellaneous   Provisions   Act,   1952 (hereinafter   referred   to   as   the   “Act”). 
 
WHY SPECIAL ALLOWANCE IS ELIGIBLE FOR PF DEDUCTION?

The   appeals   raise   a common question of law, if the special allowances paid byan establishment to its employees would fall within the expression“basic wages” under Section 2(b)(ii) read with Section 6 of the Act for   computation   of   deduction   towards   Provident   Fund.     The appeals   have   therefore   been   heard   together   and   are   being disposed by a common order.

The   respondent   is   an unaided school giving special allowance by way of incentive to teaching   and   non­teaching   staff   pursuant   to   an  agreement between   the   staff   and   the   management.    
SINGLE JUDGE HELD THAT NO PF DEDUCTION IS TO BE MADE ON SPECIAL ALLOWANCE.

The   incentive   was reviewed from time to time upon enhancement of the tuition fees of   the   students.  

The   authority   under   the   Act   held   that   the special allowance was to be included in basic wage for deduction of provident fund.   

The Single Judge set aside the order. 

DIVISION BENCH ALSO HELD SPECIAL ALLOWNACE IS NOT FALL UNDER SALARY

 The subsequentDivision Bench dismissed the appeal holding that the special allowance   was   not   linked   to   the   consumer   price   index,   and therefore did not fall within the definition of basic wage, thus not liable to deduction.

VIEW OF THE SUPREME COURT

Applying  the   aforesaid   tests  to   the   facts   of the presentappeals, no material has been placed by the establishments todemonstrate that the allowances in question being paid to itsemployees were either variable or were linked to any incentive forproduction resulting in greater output by an employee and thatthe allowances in question were not paid across the board to allemployees in a particular category or were being paid especiallyto those who avail the opportunity. 

WHAT CONSTITUTE A SPECIAL ALLOWANCE?

In order that the amount goes   beyond   the basic   wages,  it   has   to   be   shown   that   the workman   concerned   had   become   eligible   to   get   this   extra amount   beyond   the   normal   work   which he   was   otherwise required to put in.  

There is no data available on record to showwhat were thenorms of work prescribed for those workmen during   the relevant   period.    

WHETHER ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCE FOR EXTRA WORK RENDERED BY EMPLOYEES?

 It   is   therefore   not   possible   to ascertain whether extra amounts paid to the workmen were infact paid for the extra work which had exceeded the normaloutput prescribed for the workmen. 

ALLOWANCE IS A PART OF THE SALARY  

The wage structure and thecomponents of salary have been examined on facts, both by theauthority and the appellate authority under the Act, who havearrived at a factual conclusion that the allowances in questionwere essentially a part of the basic wage camouflaged as part of an   allowance   so   as   to   avoid   deduction   and   contribution accordingly  to   the   provident   fund   account   of   the   employees.

SUPREME COURT HELD THAT SPECIAL ALLOWANCE IS PART OF  SALARY

There is no occasion for us to interfere with the concurret conclusions   of   facts.     The   appeals   by   the   establishmentstherefore merit no interference.  Conversely, for the same reason the   appeal   preferred   by   the  Regional   Provident   Fund Commissioner deserves to be allowed.


WHAT IS BASIC WAGE AS PER PF ACT ,1952

As per the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, “basic wages” means all emoluments which are earned by an employee while on duty or on leave or on holidays with wages in either case in accordance with the terms of the contract of employment and which are paid or payable in cash to him.
EXEMPTED ALLOWANCE FOR PF CALCULATION
 However, the Act excludes these two important emoluments following from the definition of Basic Wages or Salary:
(i) the cash value of any food concession;

(ii) any dearness allowance that is to say, all cash payments by whatever name called paid to an employee on account of a rise in the cost of living, house-rent allowance, overtime allowance, bonus, commission or any other similar allowance payable to the employee in respect of his employment or of work done in such employment
 WAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE PRODUCTION BONUS OR INCENTIVE WAGE
SC observed “ whatever is payable by all concerns or earned by all permanent employees had to be included in basic wage for the purpose of deduction under Section 6 of the Act. It is only when a worker produces beyond the base standard, what he earns would not be a basic wage but a production bonus or incentive wage which would then fall outside the purview of basic wage under Section 2(b) of the Act. 
The test adopted to determine if any payment was to be excluded from basic wage is that the payment under the scheme must have a direct access and linkage to the payment of such special allowance as not being common to all. The crucial test is one of universality.
 PF WILL COVER FOR ALL ALLOWANCES 
Currently, as per the salary structure, the employees are supposed to contribute the mandatory 12 per cent towards their PF. The other emoluments are shown as different allowances such as house rent allowance, special allowance etc. even though they form a part of the total salary or cost to the company. Now after SC judgement PF contribution will be on the total amount including all the allowances paid to an employee and not just on the basic salary.
 ONLY UP TO RS 15000 WILL BE TAKEN AS SALARY AND ALLOWANCE FOR PF CALCULATION
The impact will be the contribution towards EPF will be on a higher amount and hence less take-home pay for the employee however the the retirement kitty will see more inflows as higher monthly PF contribution will move into the employee’s PF account. The order will be applicable to those with a basic salary and allowances up to Rs 15,000 as PF contribution. Beyond that, PF is not mandatory

HOW SC RULING WILL WORK

The SC ruling means is that those earning salary and special allowances together up to Rs 15,000 will now have to club it for purpose of PF deductions. Earlier, only the basic salary would be taken into account for PF calculation. For instance, if an employee's basic salary is Rs 8,000 and gets special allowances of Rs 5,000, unlike earlier where the PF deduction would apply only on basic salary, now it will be clubbed with special allowance and deductions calculated on a combined sum of Rs 13,000



REQUESTING MCA TO ISSUE NOTIFICATION ABOUT GIVING A WEBLINK OF ANNUAL RETURN IN BOARD’S REPORT OF COMPANIES.


REQUESTING MCA TO ISSUE NOTIFICATION ABOUT GIVING A WEBLINK OF ANNUAL RETURN IN BOARD’S REPORT OF COMPANIES.

GIVING WEB-LINK OF ANNUAL RETURN IN BOARD’S REPORT

As per Companies Act ,2013, the companies have to give a web-link of annual return in Board’s report and publish the same in their websites.

SECTION 134 OF CA 2013 AND MGT-9 EXTRACT

As per CA, 2013 section 134, Companies was required to prepare MGT-9 extract of Annual Return and such MGT-9 was required to file with Directors Report.

NOW , NO EXTRACT OF MGT-9 IS NEEDED TO BE PUBLISHED

Nonetheless, this provision has been amended by CAA, 2017 w.e.f. 31.7.2018 i.e. as per notification dated 31st July, 2017 provision in relation to MGT-9 has been removed from Section 134 .
R V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail..,

TO GIVE A WEB LINK FOR ANNUAL RETURN

Thus , a new provision is added i.e. “the web address, if any, where annual return referred to in sub-section (3) of section 92 has been placed”.
Consequently, we can come to a conclusion that MGT-9 is not required to prepare by any Company if Directors Report approved in Board Meeting on or after 31st July, 2018.
Thus, as per Companies Act ,2013, the companies have to give a web-link of annual return in Board’s report and publish the same in their websites.

YET TO BE NOTIFIED BY MCA

However , this has not yet notified by the MCA as on date.

 If a Company doesn’t having website, whether it is mandatory to Prepare MGT-9?
As per Section, 134 Companies have to give the link of Annual return in Directors Report only in the condition if Company having website. However , it is silent about those companies which do not have website.
It is not clear whether companies which do not have website , what they have to do as they cannot give web-link of their Annual Return in their Board Report.

FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED BY MCA

Hence , there prevail confusion whether Companies have to give a web-link of their annual return in their Board’s report and to publish their same in their websites or not for the financial year 2018-2019.

It is submitted  that MCA to notify the above at the earliest so that the prevailing confusion over the above issueS can be resolved at the earliest.

R V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail..,



Tuesday, February 26, 2019

FORM ACTIVE INC-22A SHOULD BE AMENDED TO CAPTURE THE DETAILS OF APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARIAL AUDITOR BY LISTED COMPANIES WHICH WOULD ENSURE 100% COMPLIANCE BY LISTED COMPANIES.


FORM ACTIVE INC-22A  SHOULD BE AMENDED TO CAPTURE THE DETAILS OF APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARIAL AUDITOR BY LISTED COMPANIES WHICH WOULD ENSURE 100% COMPLIANCE BY LISTED COMPANIES.

WHAT IS SECRETARIAL AUDIT ?

Secretarial Audit is introduced by recently enacted Companies Act, 2013. It is a process to check compliances made by the Company under Corporate Law & other laws, rules, regulations, procedures etc. It is a mechanism to monitor compliance with the requirements of stated laws and processes. Periodically examination of work is necessary to point out errors & mistakes and to make a robust compliance mechanism system in an organization.,


R V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail..,

TO WHICH COMPANIES SECRETARIAL AUDIT IS MANDATORY?
As per section 204 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, following companies are required to obtain ‘Secretarial Audit Report’ form independent practicing company secretary;
(1)   Every listed company
(2)   Every public company having a paid-up share capital of Fifty Crore rupees or more; or
(3)   (b) Every public company having a turnover of Two Hundred Fifty Crore rupees or more.
·        “Turnover” means the aggregate value of the realisation of amount made from the sale, supply or distribution of goods or on account of services rendered, or both, by the company during a financial year. [Section 2(91)].

·        Secretarial Audit is also mandatory to a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company, and which falls under the prescribed class of companies
·         
WHO CAN BE APPOINTED AS SECRETARIAL AUDITOR?
Only a member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India holding certificate of practice (company secretary in practice) can conduct Secretarial Audit and furnish the Secretarial Audit Report to the Company.

APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARIAL AUDITOR
As per Rule 8 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its powers) Rules, 2014, Secretarial Auditor is required to be appointed by means of resolution passed at a duly convened Board meeting and resolution for appointment shall be filed with Registrar of Companies within 30 days in E-form MGT-14.
It is advisable for Secretarial Auditor to get the letter of engagement from the company. Secretarial Auditor should formally accept the letter of engagement. Further, as a prudent corporate practice, it is advisable that change in the Secretarial Auditor during the year is reported to the members in the Board’s Report.
FAILURE TO APPOINT A SECRETARIAL AUDITOR

Many Listed companies and those companies which has to appoint a secretarial auditor are not adhering the same.
Like not appointing company secretary , secretarial auditor is not being appointed by listed companies and other eligible companies in India.
FORM ACTIVE INC-22A
Now , the Form Active INC-22A  now demands the company secretary details to be filled in the form whose paid-up share capital crosses Rs 5 Crores.

Now,If a company has not appointed a company secretary , then such company cannot file the form Active INC-22A.  

FAILURE TO COMPLY
If the Companies do not intimate on or before 25.04.2019, such Companies shall be marked “ACTIVE NON COMPLIANT “ and shall be liable to action under subsection (9) of Section 12 of the Act .
FORM ACTIVE INC-22A SHOULD CONTAIN THE DETAILS OF THE APPOINTMENT SECRETARIAL AUDITOR.

FORM ACTIVE INC-22A is silent about filling in the details of the appointment of secretarial auditor .

It is suggested the Form Active Inc-22 should be amended to include the details of the secretarial auditor appointment and the details of the Form MGT-14 as regards to the appointment of secretarial auditor.

APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARIAL AUDITOR SHOULD BE IN AGM

Now , Appointment of Statutory Auditor is made in the General Meeting and the company has to file ADT-1 in the regard with the MCA.

It is suggested that the appointment of Secretarial Auditor should be made in the AGM and form for such appointment should be filed with the MCA and SRN number of that form should be filled in the form FORM ACTIVE INC-22A.

This will ensure strict compliance as regards to the appointment of Secretarial Auditor by the listed companies and other eligible companies.

R V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail..,



Monday, February 25, 2019

Whether RBI has the power to deregister NBFCs which has not owned net worth of Rs 2 Crores?



Whether RBI has the power to deregister NBFCs which has not owned net worth of Rs 2 Crores?

Nahar Finance and Leasing Limited and others  Vs RBI , Chennai

WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the first respondent of the order passed in the matter of Nahar Finance & Leasing Limited issued by RBI, Chennai and to quash the same as illegal, contrary to the provisions of the RBI Act and against the principles of natural justice and fair play.

THE OBJECT OF WRIT PETITIONS

The challenge in these writ petitions is to the cancellation of the Certificate of Registration issued by the Reserve Bank of India in favour of the petitioners.

WHAT NBFC's SHOULD NOT DO?

 V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail..,

PETITIONERS PRAYER

The writ petitioners are all Non-Banking Financial Companies (in short, "NBFC") and it is their claim that they have been complying with all the statutory regulations and regularly filing various returns and furnishing the required information before the Registrar of Companies.

The petitioner companies claim that they are assessed to income tax. These companies claimed that they have also obtained Certificate of Registration (in short, "CoR"), after the amendment of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (in short, "RBI Act"), which was brought into force with effect from 09.01.1997.



PROHIBITION BY NBFC TO CARRY ON BUSINESS

There was a prohibition for an NBFC to commence or carry on the business, unless it has a Net Owned Fund (in short, "NOF") of twenty-five lakh rupees or such other amount, not exceeding two hundred lakh rupees, as the Reserve Bank of India (in short, "RBI") may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify.

The RBI, by http://www.judis.nic.in 5 notification No.DNBR.007/CGM(CDS)-2015, dated 27.03.2015, specified two hundred lakhs rupees as the NOF required for an NBFC to commence or carry on the business. It further provided that an NBFC holding a CoR and having NOF of less than two hundred lakhs of rupees may continue to carry on the business, if such company achieves the NOF of one hundred lakhs or rupees before 01.04.2016 and two hundred lakhs of rupees before 01.04.2017.

 V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail..,


SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BY RBI FOR CANCELLING THE CoR

The second respondent issued separate Show Cause Notices (in short, "SCN") dated 23.04.2018 to the petitioners proposing to cancel the CoR issued under Section 45-IA(6) of the RBI Act and also to initiate penal action under Section 58 B of the said Act for noncompliance of the revised regulatory framework for NBFCs issued on 27.03.2015.

PRAYER BY PETITIONERS TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE

Petitioners submitted that due to significant change in the economy and also the policy of the Government of India during the Financial Years 2016-17 and 2017-18 like de-monetization, implementation of Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act), etc., the entire working of the industry was affected throughout the country, in particular, the finance sector and hence, sought for extension of time till 31.03.2019 to comply with the requirement of enhanced NOF, as per the revised guidelines issued by the RBI.

ORDER BY CHENNAI HIGH COURT

The respondents (RBI) have not considered the request of the petitioners' companies and had blindly issued the impugned orders cancelling the CoR without application of mind.

For the afore-stated reasons, the impugned orders need interference. Accordingly, these writ petitions are allowed and the impugned orders are set aside. Resultantly, the respondents are directed to restore CoR to the petitioners and also extend time to the petitioners to comply with the requirement under Section 45-IA of the RBI Act till 31.03.2019.

 If the petitioners fail to comply with the said requirement within the period extended above, it is open to the respondents to take action in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

 V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail..,


Sunday, February 24, 2019

NOW , FORM ACTIVE (INC -22 A) CANNOT BE FILED WHICH IS MANDATORY FOR EACH & EVERY COMPANY IF IT DOES NOT SATISFY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS LIKE COMPANY SECRETARY


NOW , FORM ACTIVE (INC -22 A) CANNOT BE FILED WHICH IS MANDATORY FOR EACH & EVERY COMPANY IF IT DOES NOT SATISFY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.


As per help kit, INC-22A form (ACTIVE) cannot be filed in following cases:

1)

If the number of directors is less than minimum prescribed under the Act.
2)
If DIN status of any director is notapproved.

3)
If the company does not have any KMP (MD/WTD/CEO/CFO/CS) if mandatory as per the Act.
4)
If the company does not have cost auditor if mandatory as per the Act.
5)

If Balance Sheet and annual return for 2017-18 are not filed.
6)
If ADT-1 is not filed for 2018-19.


BREAKING NEWS

COMPANY WHICH HAS NOT APPOINTED A COMPANY SECRETARY – FORM ACTIVE CANNOT BE FILED BY IT UNTIL THE APPOINTMENT OF COMPANY SECRETARY

ALL THOSE COMPANIES WHOSE PAID UP CAPITAL IS 5 CRORE OR ABOVE WILL HAVE TO APPOINT A WHOLE TIME COMPANY SECRETARY WITHIN 2 MONTHS TO KEEP THE STATUS ACTIVE OF THE COMPANY.

R V Seckar , practicing company secrertary , 9848915177 , rvsekar2007@gmail.com


Friday, February 22, 2019

COMPLIANCE TO BE FOLLOWED BY COMPANIES & FILING OF FORMS IN MARCH AND APRIL 2019


FILING OF FORMS IN MARCH AND APRIL 2019

COMPLIANCE TO BE FOLLOWED BY COMPANIES
Name of the Form
Due Date for Filing Form
Purpose of the Form
MSME 1
within 30 days from date of availability of form on MCA portal
Specified Companies (Furnishing of Information about payment to Micro & Small Enterprises Supplies) Order, 2019
DPT 3
within 90days from date of notifications i.e 20th April 2019
Return of deposits.
E form Active ( INC 22A)
on or before 25the April 2019
Active Company Tagging Identities and Verification
DIN 3KYC
on or before 30th April 2019
DIRECTOR'S KYC UPDATION
MSME 1 (1st half)
on or before 30th April 2019
Companies (Furnishing of Information about payment to Micro & Small Enterprises Supplies) Order, 2019
MSME 1 (2nd half)
on or before 30th October 2019
Companies (Furnishing of Information about payment to Micro & Small Enterprises Supplies) Order, 2019
FORM NFRA-1
within 30 days from date of availability of form on MCA portal
The particulars of the auditor

Please note that NFRA 1 is not applicable to :
1.Private Companies;
2. Unlisted public companies with paid-up capital or turnover or aggregate of loans, debentures and deposits below the limit stated in Rule 3(1) and
3. Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)


Form BEN-2
within 30 days from the date of receipt of Ben-1
 Declaration of  the significant beneficial ownership

ANNUAL FORMS
Annual DPT 3
on or before 30th June 2019
Return of deposits
Annual Filling AOC 4:
on or before 30th October 2019
Annual Accounts Filing
Annual Return MGT 7
on or before 29th November 2019
Annual Return Filing


\
R V Seckar practicing company secretary , 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail.com,