Thursday, February 20, 2025
#PAYTM'S FORMER INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR ,COMPLIANCE OFFICER AND FORMER DIRECTORS WERE DIRECTED TO PAY RS 3.32 CRORE TO SETTLE ALLEGED SEBI NORMS VIOLATIOS
#PAYTM'S FORMER INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR ,COMPLIANCE OFFICER AND FORMER DIRECTORS WERE DIRECTED TO PAY RS 3.32 CRORE TO SETTLE ALLEGED SEBI NORMS VIOLATIOS
Allegations include those involving benefits given to Vijay Shekhar
Sharma, Promoter of the company and his relatives, and authorising and signing
public offer documents that contained incorrect statements and incomplete
disclosures on the promoter entity.
The above mentioned officials of
Paytm have paid fines to the Securities and Exchange Board of India
(SEBI) to settle alleged violation of norms.
Failure to ensure conformity with the regulatory provisions applicable to
the listed entity in letter and spirit, in violation of Regulation 6 (2) of
LODR Regulations, 2015.
Independent Directors being part of NRC failed to discharge duties with
unbiased and independent approach while decision-making w.r.t. matters
involving benefits to Mr. Vijay Shekhar Sharma (MD&CEO, Paytm) and his
relatives, in violation of Regulation 4 (2) of LODR Regulations, 2015.
Directors being part of
Board of Director as on date of Prospectus authorized and signed offer
documents containing incorrect statement and incomplete disclosures w.r.t.
Company being professionally managed company.
NON COMPLIANCE WILL
RESULT IN NOT ONLY MONETARY LOSSES BUT ALSO BAD IMAGE IN THE INVESTORS MARKET.
Monday, February 10, 2025
Monday, February 3, 2025
WHY COMPLIANCE OFFICERS OF SOME LISTED COMPANIES ARE RESIGNING THEIR POSITION OF LATE ?
WHY COMPLIANCE OFFICERS OF SOME LISTED COMPANIES ARE RESIGNING THEIR POSITION OF LATE ?
SEBI expects numerous compliances from listed entities and vide SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR”) establishes a framework for corporate governances applicable to every entity listed with stock exchange(s) in India.
One of the primary requirements of the LODR is the appointment of a qualified company secretary in the capacity of a compliance officer, to ensure conformity with SEBI regulations in letter as well as spirit.
In majority of the cases, as per the PIT Regulations, a compliance officer could be any senior officer who is designated so and is reporting to the board of directors and in normal course , Company Secretaries are designated as Compliance Officer in a listed company.
Compliance officer being one of the key personnel has an important role to play in the company for monitoring adherence to SEBI regulations, preservation of price sensitive information and implementation of code.
WHAT ARE THE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF A COMPLIANCE OFFICER?
- To carry out due diligence on the company’s records.
- To Handle Quarterly, half-yearly& annual compliances.
- To liaison before stock exchanges on behalf of the company and to take care of compliancesf PIT Regulations , Insider trading and LODR provisions.
- To authenticate all legal documents of the company.
- To bridge the gap between the company and investors.
- To draft minutes and keep records of all statutory meetings.
- Implementation and management of compliance reporting to all the statutory bodies.
POOR SALARY , IMPROPER TREATMENT OF COMPLIANCE OFFICERS
A Compliance officer has so many responsibilities and compliances to be under taken other than SEBI LODR ,PIT & Stock Exchange regulations in the case of listed companies. However , majority of listed companies pay very minimum salary as compared to their over burden work nature. Many compliance officers are under stress and send sleepless nights worrying about the compliances. Poor salary , improper treatment of compliance officers by listed companies management make them to resign their jobs at frequent intervals.
What are the compliance requirements for a company?
Some of those important laws have been briefly explained below:
Factories Act, 1948: An Act dedicated to the occupational safety, health and welfare of workmen employed at factories or manufacturing units.
Employees Provident Fund (EPF) Act, 1952: Provisions dedicated to the security of an employee after retirement from service.
Employees’ State Insurance (ESI) Act, 1948: An Act containing health safety provisions to grant security to employees against risks during employment.
Professional Tax Act (State Laws): Some states in India like Telangana, and Maharashtra have imposed taxes on certain professions including trades and employment.
Labour Welfare Fund Acts (State Laws): States like Haryana, Punjab, Maharashtra etc. have this legislation to finance certain activities dedicated to the welfare of the labour.
Maternity Benefit Act, 1961: The legislation protects the employment of a woman during her maternity period through certain benefits.
Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970: An Act to protect contract labour and to ensure safe work conditions for them.
Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013: A legislation to protect women against any sexually coloured acts or remarks at the workplace and ensure a safe work environment.
Minimum Wages Act, 1948: An Act dedicated to the fixation of minimum wage rates in certain occupations.
Payment of Wages Act, 1936: Provisions for regulation of period of wages and to provide a remedy against unexplained or unauthorised deductions.
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972: An Act that requires certain industries or employers to pay their retiring employees a one-time gratuity amount.
Payment of Bonus Act, 1965: Based on the profits of a company, the Act obliges employers to designate the minimum and maximum bonus percentage.
Equal Remuneration Act, 1976: A legislation to prevent any discrimination at the workplace based on gender.
Compliances under GST Act, Income –Tax Act.
CONCLUSION
The role of compliance officer in a listed company for the aforesaid reasons is abound with risks for a professional from a regulatory perspective. Therefore, it is extremely important for the professional to meticulously examine the applicable SEBI regulations while accepting the role of a compliance officer and negotiate on matters such as D&O liability insurance or indemnity protection prior to accepting such a position in a listed entity.
Thursday, January 23, 2025
LETHARGY IN COMPLIANCE -TATA STEEL IS TO PAY A PENALTY OF RS 1.46 CRPRES AS LATE STAMP DUTY PAYABLE IN A MERGER
LETHARGY IN COMPLIANCE- TATA STEEL IS TO PAY A PENALTY OF RS 1.46 CRORES AS LATE STAMP DUTY FILING IN TATA –TINPLATE MERGER MOVE · Tata Steel Limited received an Adjudication Order imposing a penalty of ₹1,46,14,380/- for late filing of a stamp-duty application for merger.
· The penalty relates to the stamp duty payable for the amalgamation of The Tinplate Company of India Limited and Tata Steel Limited, sanctioned by the National Company Law Tribunal , Mumbai.
· The Collector of Stamps, Enforcement – I, Mumbai, Government of Maharashtra under Section 39 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 issued the Order imposing a penalty of ₹1,46,14,380/- on Tata Steel.
· As per the Maharashtra Stamp Act, on an order of amalgamation wherein there is some immoveable property of the transferor present in the state, the stamp duty payable can be up to 5% of the total consideration for the amalgamation (aggregating both the cash paid as well as market value of shares exchanged).
· The penalty is towards the belated filing of stamp-duty application for necessary payment of stamp duty to the appropriate authority as per the provisions of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958
· There is a failure in compliance by Tata Steel Ltd to pay stamp duty on merger within the prescribed time and hence it has to pay a huge and heft penalty of Rs 1,46,14,380/-.
COMPLIANCE IS LESS COSTLIER THAN NON-COMPLIANCE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)