ROC CUTTACK IMPOSED PENALTIES ON MAGNUM SEA FOODS LIMITED FOR PAYMENT OF EXCESS MANAGERIAL REMUNERATION
ROC CUTTACK Vs MAGNUM SEA FOODS LIMITED
FACTS OF THE CASE
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) Cuttack imposed a
total penalty of ₹10 lakh on Magnum Sea Foods Limited and five of its directors
for paying managerial remuneration in excess of the limits prescribed under
Section 197 of the Companies Act, 2013
WHY PENALTY WAS LEVIED BY ROC
The penalty was imposed because the company paid
remuneration to its directors that exceeded the maximum limits permitted by
Section 197 of the Companies Act, 2013, without following the correct procedure
for obtaining approval.
KEY REGULATIONS UNDER THE ACT STATE THAT:
·
The total
managerial remuneration payable by a public company in a financial year must
not exceed 11% of its net profits.
·
Remuneration
in excess of this limit can be paid if approved by the shareholders via a
special resolution.
·
The company
is also required to refund any excess remuneration drawn or received without
the necessary approvals
CONTENTION BY MAGNUM SEA FOODS LIMITED
· Magnum Sea Foods Limited had claimed that a special resolution had been passed to authorize the remuneration
·
Payments
were transparently disclosed in the Board’s Report and statutory filings.
·
The company
was profit-making and acted in good faith
However, the Adjudicating Officer found this submission insufficient to negate the violation, leading to the penalties.
PAYMENT OF PENALTY TIMELINE
Penalties must be paid within 90 days, failing which
further consequences under Section 454(8) may apply.
RELIEF TO INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS:
Independent Directors were exempted from penalty,
citing MCA’s SOP (General Circular No. 1/2020), as there was no evidence of their involvement in day-to-day management or
consent to the violation .
WHAT THIS CASE SIGNIFIES?
This case highlights the strict enforcement by the
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) regarding compliance with the rules on
managerial remuneration, emphasizing the need for proper governance and timely
filings.
Even with shareholder approval and disclosures,
director remuneration must strictly comply with statutory limits. Governance
lapses—even perceived ones—can attract heavy penalties.
APPEAL TO REGIONAL DIRECTOR
MAGNUM SEA
FOODS LIMITED may apply to Regional director
within 90 days to waive the penalty imposed by arguing
• Magnum Sea Foods Limited had claimed that a
special resolution had been passed to authorize the remuneration
• Payments were transparently disclosed in the
Board’s Report and statutory filings.
• The company was profit-making and acted in
good faith
R V SECKAR
, FCS, LLB 79047 19295

No comments:
Post a Comment