BAJRANGBALI SPONGE AND POWER LIMITED WAS PENALISED BY THE REGISTRAR OF
COMPANIES (ROC), CUTTACK, FOR FAILING TO APPOINT A CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(CFO) FOR OVER SIX YEARS (2014–2020)
ROC CUTTACK vs BAJRANGBALI SPONGE AND POWER LIMITED
FACTS OF THE CASE
Bajrangbali Sponge and Power Limited was penalised by the Registrar of
Companies (RoC), Cuttack, for failing to appoint a Chief Financial Officer
(CFO) for over six years (2014–2020), despite being legally required under
Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013. The company and its directors were
fined ₹5 lakh each for prolonged non-compliance.
VIOLATION:
Failure to appoint a whole-time CFO despite having paid-up share capital
exceeding ₹10 crore (making CFO appointment mandatory).
LAW INVOKED:
Section 203(1)(iii) of the Companies Act, 2013, read with Rule 8 of the
Companies (Appointment and Remuneration) Rules, 2014.
PENALTY:
· ₹5,00,000 on the company.
· ₹5,00,000 each on several directors/officers.
LEGAL BACKGROUND
Under Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013:
· Certain classes of companies must appoint Key
Managerial Personnel (KMP), including a Managing Director/CEO, a Company
Secretary (CS), and a Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
· Non-compliance attracts penalties under Section
203(5):
· Company: Fine up to ₹5 lakh.
· Officers in default: Fine up to ₹50,000 plus ₹1,000 per day of continuing default.
COMPARISON OF PENALTIES
|
COMPANY |
PERIOD OF DEFAULT |
POSITIONS VACANT |
PENALTY AMOUNT |
|
Bajrangbali Sponge & Power Ltd |
2014–2020 (6 yrs) |
CFO |
₹5 lakh (company) + ₹5 lakh each director |
|
Virupaksha Organics Ltd |
2018–2021 (3 yrs) |
CS & CFO |
₹79.40 lakh total |
|
Mahatamil Mining & Thermal Ltd |
2014–2023 (9 yrs) |
CS, CFO, MD |
₹75.18 lakh total |
KEY LESSONS LEARNED
·
Mandatory
CFO appointment applies to companies with paid-up capital ≥ ₹10 crore.
·
Non-compliance
is costly: penalties can reach tens of lakhs depending on duration and
positions vacant.
·
Regulators
are strict: pleas for leniency (e.g., citing administrative oversight or
pandemic delays) are often rejected.
·
Best
practice: Companies should proactively appoint KMPs to avoid financial and
reputational damage.
#YOUR COMPLIANCE PARTNER R V SECKAR, FCS, LLB 79047 19295,

No comments:
Post a Comment