Tuesday, August 28, 2018

CHANGES IN THE CODE OF CONDUCT DUE TO RECENT CHANGES IN THE LODR FOR LISTED COMPANIES




CHANGES IN THE CODE OF CONDUCT DUE TO RECENT CHANGES IN THE LODR FOR LISTED COMPANIES

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF COMPANY XYZ LTD

 SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015

Board of Directors of the Company has revised its Code of Conduct for all members of Board of Directors and Senior Management of the Company to bring it in conformity with provisions of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

MEANING OF SENIOR MANAGEMENT

 For this purpose, the term “Senior Management” shall mean personnel of the Company who are members of its core management team excluding the Board of Directors. Normally this would comprise all members of management one level below the Executive Directors including all functional heads.

 In other words Executive Directors (non Board members), Senior Vice Presidents/Vice Presidents and other functional heads will fall under the purview of this Code. This Code shall also be put on the Company’s web site.

In pursuance of the said provisions, the Board of Directors of the Company in their meeting held on ------ approved the revised Code of Conduct which has become effective w.e.f.-------------. A copy of the Code of Conduct as approved by the Board of Directors is provided hereinafter.

THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

  • This Code of Conduct will provide Directors and Senior Management of -------Ltd. (the Company) general guidance on the standards of conduct expected of the Directors and Senior Management including guidelines on conflict of interests. 

  • Within the Company there are other policies/procedures, which complement or support this Code. Board Members and Members of Senior Management will   Exercise the care, diligence and skill of a reasonably prudent person under comparable· circumstances.  

  • ·        Ensure to enhance and maintain the reputation of the Company.

  • ·     Strive to contribute toward the growth, stability and service that the Company seeks to· provide to its consumers, members, stakeholders and society in general.  Conduct themselves in a professional, courteous, and respectful manner at all times.


·  Make available to and share with fellow Directors all information as may be relevant to ensure proper conduct and sound operation of the Company.

DUTIES OF DIRECTORS INCLUDING INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

 The Directors including Independent Directors shall adhere to the roles and duties as defines under the provisions of Companies act, 2013 and SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 besides other roles and duties as may be referred by the Board of Directors of the Company from time to time.

COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS

The Company’s Directors and Senior Management shall comply with all the applicable provisions of laws and regulations of the countries in which the company operates. Company’s Directors and Senior Management shall contact Company’s legal counsel in case they have questions regarding applicable laws.

No Director or Member of Senior Management shall commit or condone an illegal act or instruct another employee, etc. to do so.

Directors and other Senior Management are expected to be sufficiently familiar with any legislation that applies to their work, to recognize potential liabilities and to know when to seek legal advice.

No Director or Member of Senior Management staff shall create or condone the creation of a false record and shall not destroy or condone the destruction of a record, except in accordance with the guidelines laid down in this regard or permitted under any law of the land for the time being in force.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

 A Director or a Member of Senior Management has an actual conflict of interest when he is performing a duty or function of the position and in the performance of that duty or function has the opportunity to further his or her private interests.

There is an apparent conflict of interest when a reasonably well-informed person could perceive that a Director’s or Member of Senior Management’s ability to perform a duty or function of the position was or will be affected by the Directors’ or Member of Senior Management’s private interest.

The Company depends upon the integrity of all the Directors and Members of Senior Management who have knowledge of a decision or activity of the Company that involves or might involve a conflict of interest.

Directors and Member of Senior Management will perform their duties conscientiously.

 Every Director and Member of Senior Management must avoid any situation in which there is an actual or apparent conflict of interest that could interfere or could be perceived to interfere with the Director’s or Member of Senior Management’s judgment in making decisions in the Company’s best interests.

Every Director and Member of Senior Management shall disclose all the circumstances that constitute an actual or apparent conflict of interest. These disclosures shall be made to the Board of Directors.

OUTSIDE BUSINESS INTERESTS

Directors and Members of Senior Management should declare their outside business interests at the time of engagement and are required to limit outside business activities to avoid any conflict of interests or breaches of any of the provision of this Code. Notwithstanding any outside business activity, Directors and Members of Senior Management are required to act in the best interests of the Company.

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

 Directors and Members of Senior Management should at all times maintain the confidentiality of all confidential information and all records of the Company, and must not make use of or reveal such information or records except in course of the performance of their duties or unless the documents or information becomes matter of general public knowledge.

Similarly, Directors and Members of Senior Management should not use the confidential information obtained through their association or employment with the Company to further their private interests or the private interests of their relatives.

Directors and Members of Senior Management using the Company’s computer data base or electronic mail system will be expected to comply with any internal policies and procedures that guide the storage, use and transmission or information through this medium.

INVESTMENT IN COMPANY’S SHARES

 Directors or Members of Senior Management are expected to comply with the Insider Trading Regulations of the Company and/or any other regulations/guidelines regarding investment in the Company’s shares issued, from time to time, by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).

OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT

Directors or Members of Senior Management may hold outside jobs or engage in modest self employment activities in their own time, using their own resources, and in a manner not adversely affecting their performance in the Company. 

However, no Directors or Members of Senior Management may accept work with a competitor, or with any entity that could lead to conflict of interest or a situation prejudicial to the interests of the Company.

ENTERTAINMENT, GIFTS AND BENEFITS

It is essential to the efficient business practices that all those who do business with the Company as contractors/customers etc. have access to the Company on equal terms.

Directors or Members of Senior Management should not accept entertainment or gifts (gifts or entertainment in this clause includes cash, preferred loans, securities or secret commissions), which grant or appear to grant preferential treatment to a potential or actual contractor/customer of the Company. A business relationship with the Company will be conditional on compliance with this Code.

Similarly, no Director or Member of Senior Management may offer entertainment, gifts of benefits, in order to secure preferential treatment for the Company.

Gifts, entertainment and benefits may only be accepted or offered by a Director or Member of Senior Management in the normal exchanges common to business relationships.

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 The Directors and Members of Senior Management will encourage and support the professional development of the employees of the Company and provide them all necessary assistance and cooperation.

ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY

Environmental Protection is a fundamental value of the Company. Directors and members of Senior Management have a crucial role in ensuring that Company’s operations comply with the environmental legislation and standards.

Safety must be everyone’s concern. The Company is committed to providing all employees a safe, healthful and harassment free workplace and to ensuring safe and respectful work practices and conditions.

 Directors and Members of Senior Management have both a legal and a moral responsibility for the safety and the protection of the environment.
PATENT AND DISCOVERIES

Directors and Members of Senior Management are often engaged in various forms of research or problem solving for the Company. The product of their efforts produced within the scope of their employment belongs to the Company, whether the product was concluded while actually at work or not.

 Such products include computer programs, technical process, inventions, research methods, reports or articles, and any other form of innovation or development. Directors and Members of Senior Management shall maintain confidentiality of these kinds of knowledge/patents and will not put the same to personal use.

USE OF THE COMPANY’S PROPERTY

 Directors or Members of Senior Management must not misappropriate the Company’s property for personal use.

 Directors and Members of Senior Management are entrusted with the care, management and cost-effective use of the Company’s property, including the use of Company’s name, and should not make use of these resources for their own personal benefit.

 Directors and Members of Senior Management should ensure that all the Company’s property assigned to them is maintained in good condition and should be able to account for such property.
 Directors and Members of Senior Management may not dispose of the Company’s property except in accordance with the guidelines for this purpose.

RESPOSIBILITY

The Company is determined to behave, and to be perceived, as an ethical corporation. Directors and Members of Senior Management must adhere to the standards described in this Code of Conduct.

WHERE TO SEEK CLARIFICATION

 Any Director or Member of Senior Management requiring any clarification regarding this Code of Conduct may contact Company Secretary.

R V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail.com,


Monday, August 27, 2018

NCLAT SET ASIDE THE PENALTY OF RS 10 LACS IMPOSED BY NCLT, MUMBAI FOR THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 252 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 FOR RESTORING THE NAME OF THE COMPANY


NCLAT SET ASIDE THE PENALTY OF RS 10 LACS IMPOSED BY NCLT, MUMBAI FOR THE APPLICATION  UNDER SECTION 252 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 FOR RESTORING THE NAME OF THE COMPANY

Rakhee Textiles Industries Pvt. Ltd. …

Versus

Registrar of Companies

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 252 OF CA 2013 FOR RESTORATION OF NAME

The appellant filed the application under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoring the name of the company in the Registrar of Companies. Earlier the name of the company was struck off by the Registrar of Companies by publishing a public notice dated 28th July, 2017, immediately thereafter the application under Section 252 was filed.

COST OF RS 10 LACS IMPOSED BY NCLT ,MUMBAI


The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case that the Annual Returns and Financial Statements for the financial years ended 31st March, 1991 to 31st March, 2017 and as the remaining documents are ready, allowed the application.

However, while allowing the application the Tribunal imposed cost of Rupees Ten lakhs on the appellant by the impugned order dated 12th April, 2018.

GRIEVANCE OF THE APPLICANT

The grievance of the appellant is limited to the imposition of the cost which according to the appellant is not justified. Notice was issued on Registrar of Companies, but no reply has been filed raising any objection.


DECISION BY NCLAT , NEW DELHI

NOT A FIT CASE FOR IMPOSITION OF FINE

Having heard learned counsel for the appellant and taking into consideration the fact that the Tribunal was satisfied that the appellant has enclosed the Audited Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31st March 1991 to 31st March 2017 allowed the petition and that the application was filed immediately after striking off its name of the company, we are of the view that it was not a fit case for imposition of the cost on the appellant.

STILL PENAL ACTION CAN BE INITIATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 2013 FOR NON –FILING

However, it does not mean we have held that for delayed filing of the Audited Report and Financial Statements for the year ended between 31st March, 1991 and 31st March, 2017, no penal order can be passed under the Companies Act, 2013.

NCLAT , NEW DELHI SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF NCLT , MUMBAI OF LEVYING FINE OF RS 10 LACS

For the reasons aforesaid, while we set aside the order dated 12th July, 2018 passed by the Tribunal, Mumbai Bench so far it relates to the imposition of cost of Rupees Ten Lakhs on the appellant giving liberty to the Registrar of Companies to pass order for not filing the Audited Reports and Financial Statements between the years ended 31st March, 1991 and 31st March, 2017, if there is any such provision under the Companies Act, 1956 / 2013.

The appeal stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations. No cost.

 R V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail.com,


Thursday, August 23, 2018

COMPANY SECRETARIES HAVE TO BE CAREFUL WHILE CERTIFYING FORMS ELSE HE IS LIKELY TO BE PUNISHED FOR NEGLIGENCE. Company Secretary cannot be punished for Misconduct for Mere Negligence in filing Form-32:


COMPANY SECRETARIES HAVE TO BE CAREFUL WHILE CERTIFYING FORMS  ELSE HE IS LIKELY TO BE PUNISHED FOR NEGLIGENCE.

Company Secretary cannot be punished for Misconduct for Mere Negligence in filing Form-32:

PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT

While quashing an order by the Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI), the Appellate Authority held that no professional misconduct can be alleged against a Company Secretary for mere negligence in filing Form-32.

CERTIFICATION AS REGARDS TO APPOINTMENT AS A ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR

The Appellant was practicing as a Company Secretary for M/s. Khosla Steel Industries Private Ltd. the allegation against the appellant was that in a Form-32, signed by Mr. Kishor Khosla, a Director of the Company and verified by the Appellant, wherein, the appointment of one Mr. Bishendra Singh was shown as a Director under the category of ‘Promoter’ and not as Additional Director.

NOT EXERCISING DUE DILIGENCE

A complaint was lodged against the appellant on the ground that while working as Company Secretary for the company, he did not exercise due diligence in verifying and certifying Form-32 on certain occasions.

GUILTY OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT

The Appellate Authority noted that the Disciplinary Committee after the remand of the matter has gone through the entire controversy in detail, given cogent reasons in holding that the Appellant was Guilty of Professional Misconduct under item (7) of Part-I of the Second Schedule of the Act in as much as he did not exercise due diligence while certifying the two Forms-32 on both the occasions and as such he was grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties.

FINDINGS BY APPELATTE AUTHORITY

Diving deeply into the facts of the case, the AA found that it is not a case where the professional i.e. the Appellant was expected to act as an investigator. “What was required for him was to only see the contents of the resolution passed and relied upon in support of Form-32 himself and in case, it was shown to him in minute books, than he should have been very categorical as to who was in possession of minute books shown to him containing the resolutions in question. However, in this regard, no assistance has been provided to us,” the AA said.

COURTESY : TAX SCAN

R V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail.com,


Tuesday, August 21, 2018

Ambiguity as regards to extract of the Annual Return - under section 92 through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017.



Ambiguity as regards to extract of the Annual Return - under section 92 through the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017.

R V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail.com,


WEBLINK OF ANNUAL RETURN

Now , the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 requires that Web-link of the annual return shall be given in the Board’s report instead of the extract of the annual return in form MGT-9.


CONFUSION AMONG PROFESSIONALS

This has created a lot of confusion among professionals as the above amendment is not notified yet. As the amendment has not been notified yet , there are two opinions on the subject-

·        One section comments that it is adequate that web-link of the annual return shall be given in the Board’s report.

·       The other section says that since section 92 is not yet notified , we have to enclose the extract of the annual return in form MGT-9.

THE FATE OF COMPANIES WHICH DO NOT HAVE A WEBSITE

There is another confusion prevails as to what would happen if a listed or a private or public company does not have a web site of its own?

If a private company does not have website, does it need to attach MGT- 9 to Board report prepared after 31st July 2018?

If a company has not a website on its own, whether it has to publish  the extract of the annual return in form MGT-9 in the Board’s report or not?

SECTION 134 OF COMPANIES ACT HAS BEEN NOTIFIED

Section 134 which deals with Financial statement and Board's Report has been notified.134 (3) (a) deals with the extract of the annual return as provided under sub-section (3) of section 92; However , section 92 (3) has not been notified  yet.

SEC. 92(3) OF THE COMPANIES ACT ,2013- NOTIFICATION IS YET TO BE RELEASED BY MCA

Even though sec. 92(3) of Bthe Companies Act ,2013 has been amended , the notification for this section is yet to be published?

As a result , all the companies (including ) listed companies which do not have their own website are in the confusion whether they have to attach the MGT- 9 to Board report prepared after 31st July 2018? Or not ?

It is sad that the abridged form of annual return has not been prescribed till date by the MCA.

WILL THE MCA ISSUE A NOTIFICATION?

Will the MCA issue a notification on the subject as all the companies are not sure what has to be followed as regards to the above.

This will a put a full-stop to the ambiguity prevailing as regards to attaching to MGT-9 to Board’s Report.

Monday, August 20, 2018

REQUEST TO PMOs OFFICE AND MCA TO ALLOW CORPORATES TO ENGAGE IN KERALA’S REHABITATION UNDER CSR SCHEME


REQUEST TO PMOs OFFICE AND MCA TO ALLOW CORPORATES TO ENGAGE IN KERALA’S REHABITATION UNDER CSR SCHEME

 R V Seckar practicing company secretary 09848915177 rvsekar2007@gmail.com,



UNPRECEDENTED FLOOD IN KERALA

Kerala State government  has suffered a loss of Rs 19,512 crore as per initial assessment due to unprecedented floods in Kerala in August 2018.

CSR UNDER UNDER SECTION 135 OF COMPANIES ACT



General Circular No. 21/2014 dated June18, 2014 of MCA has clarified that the statutory provision and provisions of CSR Rules, 2014, is to ensure that while activities undertaken in pursuance of the CSR policy must be relatable to Schedule VII of the Companies Act 2013. However, the entries in the said Schedule VII must be interpreted liberally so as to capture the essence of the subjects enumerated in the said Schedule. The items enlisted in the Schedule VII of the Act, are broad-based and are intended to cover a wide range of activities.

GOVERNMENT SHOULD ALLOW TO SPEND THEIR CSR AMOUNT FOR KERALA RELIEF FOR THIS YEAR 2018

There is a condition that a corporate should spend their CSR Amount in and around the neighborhood of their registered office or plant in which they opeate.

Government should allow the Indian Corporate to spend on infrastructure development in Kerala such as building houses who has lost their homes , building roads and other infrastructure developments due to areas affected by recent floods in 2018 for this year only.

GOVERNMENT TO ALLOW CSR SPENDING IN KERALA AS BUSINESS EXPENDITURE

The amount spent by a company towards CSR cannot be claimed as business expenditure. The Finance Act, 2014 provides that any expenditure incurred by an assessee on the activities relating to corporate social responsibility referred to in section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall not be deemed to be an expenditure incurred by the assessee for the purposes of the business or profession.



General Circular No. 21/2014 of MCA dated June 18, 2014 clarifies that Contribution to Corpus of a Trust/ Society/ Section 8 companies etc. will qualify as CSR expenditure as long as :

(a) the Trust/ Society/ Section 8 company etc. is created exclusively for undertaking CSR activities or

(b) where the corpus is created exclusively for a purpose directly relatable to a subject covered in Schedule VII of the Act

PRESENT ISSUE

Many Corporates across India want to spend their CSR amount for the flood affected Kerala. There is no notification as regards to CSR for rehabilitation of Kerala would fall under CSR activities

Request to PMOs Office and MCA

 We request the PMOs Office and MCA to issue notification compliance under section 135 of the Act in this regard so that corpoates which are desirous of helping Kerala rehabilitation can participate in the mamooth restructure by spending part or full of the CSR amount for rehabilitation of Kerala.