NOW , IT IS MANDATORY TO INCLUDE A STATEMENT IN BOARD’S
REPORT THAT COMPANY HAS COMPLIED THE PROVISION REGARDING CONSTITUTION OF INTERNAL COMPLAINTS COMMITTEE
UNDER THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORK PLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013
ORIGIN OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORK PLACE
ACT 2013
Sexual Harassment of Women at Work Place Act 2013 has been
enacted on the basis of honorable Supreme Court direction in the case of
Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan.
SUPREME COURT IN VISHAKA V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN.
In this case Supreme Court of India for the first time recognized, acknowledged and explicitly defined sexual harassment as an – unwelcome sexual gesture or behavior aimed or having a tendency to outrage the modesty of woman directly or indirectly.
Defining sexual harassment as an act aimed towards gender based discrimination that affects women’s right to life and livelihood, the Supreme Court developed broad based guidelines for employers. This mandatory guidelines known as Vishaka guidelines .
APPLICABILITY
Committee is to be set up (if you employ more than 10 women employees)
VISHAKA GUIDELINES
Some of the important
guidelines are:
·
The onus to provide a harassment free
work environment has been laid down on the employers who are required to
take the following steps:
·
Employers must form a Complaints
Committee.
· Express prohibition of sexual harassment
in any form and make the employees aware of the implications through in house
communication system / posters / meetings.
·
Must include prohibition of sexual
harassment with appropriate penalties against the offender in Conduct rules.
· Prohibition of sexual harassment in
the standing orders under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
to be included by private employers.
· Provision of appropriate work
conditions in respect of- work, leisure, health, hygiene to further ensure that
there is no hostile environment towards women.
· No woman employee should have
reasonable grounds to believe that she is disadvantaged in connection with her
employment.
· Victims of sexual harassment to be
given an option to seek transfer of the perpetrator or their own transfer of
the perpetrator or their own transfer.
NOW IT IS MANDATORY TO INCLUDE IN THE BOARD’s
REPORT
Now , it is mandatory
that the Board Report must contain Disclosure Regarding a statement that
company has complied the provision regarding
Constitution of Internal Complaints Committee Under the Sexual
Harassment of Women at work Place (Prevention,
Prohibition and Redressal) Act,
2013 which is made mandatory by
Ministry of Corporate Affairs by 31st
July, 2018 through Companies
(Accounts) Amendment Rules, 2018.
EVERY CORPORATE WHETHER LISTED OR UNLISTED OR
PRIVATE OR PUBLIC HAS TO FOLLOW
MANDATORIY
Every corporate whether listed or unlisted or private or
public has to take
note of same while preparing their Board Report pursuant to Section 134 of
companies Act, 2013 and other applicable provision and rules
thereof.
APPLICABILITY
It is applicable to all
the companies Board’s Report for the
Annual General Meeting to be held on or
before 30th
SEPTEMBER 2018.
MCA TO CLARIFY WHETHER WOMEN EMPLOYEE HARASSMENT
REPORT APPLIES TO SMALL COMPANIES AND OPCs?.
IN THE SAME MCA
CIRCULAR DATE 31ST JULY 2018 – MCA HAS PROVIDED CHANGES IN BOARD’S REPORT
FOR OPC AND SMALL COMPANIES. However , there is no mention in the new directors
report for OPC & Small companies about the statement to be included about
the sexual harassment of women employees.
However , the above
circular uses the word “Every corporate” which
means it should also applicable to OPCs and Small companies also. Thus , MCA
should clarify whether harassment of
women employees report has to be included in the director’s report of small
companies & OPCs or not.
Sir, may I know where in the Act it is mentioned the applicability as - more than 10 women employees?
ReplyDeleteSee section 6 (1) of the Act , There is an ambiguity in the section. Act says only establishment with 10 employees . But it does not mention whether it is female or male employees . We have to assume that it is pertaining to female employees as if an establishment is having only male employees this Act wont be applicable
ReplyDelete