Thursday, February 28, 2019

Supreme Court Land Mark Judgment – Now PF is applicable on basic salary plus all allowances.


Supreme Court Land Mark Judgment – Now PF is applicable on basic salary plus all allowances.

CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6221 OF 2011

THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUNDCOMMISSIONER (II) WEST BENGAL         ...APPELLANT(S)  

VERSUS

VIVEKANANDA VIDYAMANDIR AND OTHERS    ...

RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3965 3966 OF 2013

S URYA ROSHNI LTD.  ...APPELLANT(S)

                                          VERSUS

E MPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND AND OTHERS                                  ...RESPONDENT(S)

FACTS OF THE CASE

The appellants with the exception of Civil Appeal No. 6221 of   2011,   are   establishments   covered   under   the Employees’ Provident   Fund   and   Miscellaneous   Provisions   Act,   1952 (hereinafter   referred   to   as   the   “Act”). 
 
WHY SPECIAL ALLOWANCE IS ELIGIBLE FOR PF DEDUCTION?

The   appeals   raise   a common question of law, if the special allowances paid byan establishment to its employees would fall within the expression“basic wages” under Section 2(b)(ii) read with Section 6 of the Act for   computation   of   deduction   towards   Provident   Fund.     The appeals   have   therefore   been   heard   together   and   are   being disposed by a common order.

The   respondent   is   an unaided school giving special allowance by way of incentive to teaching   and   non­teaching   staff   pursuant   to   an  agreement between   the   staff   and   the   management.    
SINGLE JUDGE HELD THAT NO PF DEDUCTION IS TO BE MADE ON SPECIAL ALLOWANCE.

The   incentive   was reviewed from time to time upon enhancement of the tuition fees of   the   students.  

The   authority   under   the   Act   held   that   the special allowance was to be included in basic wage for deduction of provident fund.   

The Single Judge set aside the order. 

DIVISION BENCH ALSO HELD SPECIAL ALLOWNACE IS NOT FALL UNDER SALARY

 The subsequentDivision Bench dismissed the appeal holding that the special allowance   was   not   linked   to   the   consumer   price   index,   and therefore did not fall within the definition of basic wage, thus not liable to deduction.

VIEW OF THE SUPREME COURT

Applying  the   aforesaid   tests  to   the   facts   of the presentappeals, no material has been placed by the establishments todemonstrate that the allowances in question being paid to itsemployees were either variable or were linked to any incentive forproduction resulting in greater output by an employee and thatthe allowances in question were not paid across the board to allemployees in a particular category or were being paid especiallyto those who avail the opportunity. 

WHAT CONSTITUTE A SPECIAL ALLOWANCE?

In order that the amount goes   beyond   the basic   wages,  it   has   to   be   shown   that   the workman   concerned   had   become   eligible   to   get   this   extra amount   beyond   the   normal   work   which he   was   otherwise required to put in.  

There is no data available on record to showwhat were thenorms of work prescribed for those workmen during   the relevant   period.    

WHETHER ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCE FOR EXTRA WORK RENDERED BY EMPLOYEES?

 It   is   therefore   not   possible   to ascertain whether extra amounts paid to the workmen were infact paid for the extra work which had exceeded the normaloutput prescribed for the workmen. 

ALLOWANCE IS A PART OF THE SALARY  

The wage structure and thecomponents of salary have been examined on facts, both by theauthority and the appellate authority under the Act, who havearrived at a factual conclusion that the allowances in questionwere essentially a part of the basic wage camouflaged as part of an   allowance   so   as   to   avoid   deduction   and   contribution accordingly  to   the   provident   fund   account   of   the   employees.

SUPREME COURT HELD THAT SPECIAL ALLOWANCE IS PART OF  SALARY

There is no occasion for us to interfere with the concurret conclusions   of   facts.     The   appeals   by   the   establishmentstherefore merit no interference.  Conversely, for the same reason the   appeal   preferred   by   the  Regional   Provident   Fund Commissioner deserves to be allowed.


WHAT IS BASIC WAGE AS PER PF ACT ,1952

As per the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, “basic wages” means all emoluments which are earned by an employee while on duty or on leave or on holidays with wages in either case in accordance with the terms of the contract of employment and which are paid or payable in cash to him.
EXEMPTED ALLOWANCE FOR PF CALCULATION
 However, the Act excludes these two important emoluments following from the definition of Basic Wages or Salary:
(i) the cash value of any food concession;

(ii) any dearness allowance that is to say, all cash payments by whatever name called paid to an employee on account of a rise in the cost of living, house-rent allowance, overtime allowance, bonus, commission or any other similar allowance payable to the employee in respect of his employment or of work done in such employment
 WAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE PRODUCTION BONUS OR INCENTIVE WAGE
SC observed “ whatever is payable by all concerns or earned by all permanent employees had to be included in basic wage for the purpose of deduction under Section 6 of the Act. It is only when a worker produces beyond the base standard, what he earns would not be a basic wage but a production bonus or incentive wage which would then fall outside the purview of basic wage under Section 2(b) of the Act. 
The test adopted to determine if any payment was to be excluded from basic wage is that the payment under the scheme must have a direct access and linkage to the payment of such special allowance as not being common to all. The crucial test is one of universality.
 PF WILL COVER FOR ALL ALLOWANCES 
Currently, as per the salary structure, the employees are supposed to contribute the mandatory 12 per cent towards their PF. The other emoluments are shown as different allowances such as house rent allowance, special allowance etc. even though they form a part of the total salary or cost to the company. Now after SC judgement PF contribution will be on the total amount including all the allowances paid to an employee and not just on the basic salary.
 ONLY UP TO RS 15000 WILL BE TAKEN AS SALARY AND ALLOWANCE FOR PF CALCULATION
The impact will be the contribution towards EPF will be on a higher amount and hence less take-home pay for the employee however the the retirement kitty will see more inflows as higher monthly PF contribution will move into the employee’s PF account. The order will be applicable to those with a basic salary and allowances up to Rs 15,000 as PF contribution. Beyond that, PF is not mandatory

HOW SC RULING WILL WORK

The SC ruling means is that those earning salary and special allowances together up to Rs 15,000 will now have to club it for purpose of PF deductions. Earlier, only the basic salary would be taken into account for PF calculation. For instance, if an employee's basic salary is Rs 8,000 and gets special allowances of Rs 5,000, unlike earlier where the PF deduction would apply only on basic salary, now it will be clubbed with special allowance and deductions calculated on a combined sum of Rs 13,000



No comments:

Post a Comment