Followers of my Blog

Thursday, March 26, 2026

MANDATORY ROTATION OF DIRECTORS- NON-COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 152(6)- ROC PENALISED FUSION FINANCE LTD RS 4 LACS

 MANDATORY ROTATION OF DIRECTORS- NON-COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 152(6)- ROC PENALISED FUSION FINANCE LTD RS 4 LACS



ROC , NEW DELHI VS FUSION FINANCE LIMITED

SECTION 152(6) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 MANDATES:

·      At least 2/3rd of total directors of a public company shall be liable to retire by rotation

·      Such rotational directors must be non-independent directors

·      Ensures periodic shareholder control over board composition

VIOLATION DETAILS

PERIOD OF DEFAULT

20 July 2021 – 08 July 2023

REQUIREMENT

Minimum 3 non-independent directors liable to retire by rotation

 

ACTUAL

 

Only 1 rotational director was designated

RESULT

Non-compliance with Section 152(6) for 2 years

PENALTY IMPOSED

Person

Penalty

Company

₹3,00,000

Total

₹4,00,000

KEY OBSERVATIONS BY ROC

STRICT LIABILITY NATURE

 

Non-maintenance of board composition = direct violation

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

NOT held liable

Only those in charge of compliance treated as “officer in default”

NATURE OF PENALTY

Continuous default aggravates penalty exposure

OFFICER IN DEFAULT LIABILITY

 

·      Managing Director held personally liable

·      Reinforces Section 2(60) accountability


KEY TAKEAWAYS

This case reinforces that:

·      Board structure compliance is a substantive obligation, not a formality.

·      Increased scrutiny of governance lapses.

·      No leniency even if default is later rectified.


YOUR COMPLIANCE PARTNER – R V - SECKAR , FCS, LLB 79047 19295

No comments:

Post a Comment