MANDATORY ROTATION OF DIRECTORS- NON-COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 152(6)- ROC PENALISED FUSION FINANCE LTD RS 4 LACS
ROC , NEW DELHI VS FUSION FINANCE LIMITED
SECTION
152(6) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 MANDATES:
· At least 2/3rd of total directors of a public company
shall be liable to retire by rotation
· Such rotational directors must be non-independent
directors
· Ensures periodic shareholder control over board
composition
VIOLATION DETAILS
|
PERIOD OF DEFAULT |
20 July 2021 – 08 July
2023 |
|
REQUIREMENT |
Minimum 3 non-independent
directors liable to retire by rotation |
|
ACTUAL |
Only 1 rotational director
was designated |
|
RESULT |
Non-compliance with
Section 152(6) for 2 years |
PENALTY IMPOSED
|
Person |
Penalty |
|
Company |
₹3,00,000 |
|
Total |
₹4,00,000 |
KEY OBSERVATIONS BY ROC
|
STRICT LIABILITY NATURE |
Non-maintenance of board
composition = direct violation |
|
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS |
NOT held liable Only those in charge of
compliance treated as “officer in default” |
|
NATURE OF PENALTY |
Continuous default
aggravates penalty exposure |
|
OFFICER IN DEFAULT
LIABILITY |
· Managing Director held personally liable · Reinforces Section 2(60) accountability |
KEY TAKEAWAYS
This case
reinforces that:
·
Board
structure compliance is a substantive obligation, not a formality.
·
Increased
scrutiny of governance lapses.
·
No leniency
even if default is later rectified.
YOUR
COMPLIANCE PARTNER – R V - SECKAR , FCS, LLB 79047 19295

No comments:
Post a Comment