HAS YOUR COMPANY RECEIVED NOTICE FROM MINISTRY OF TO CORPORATE AFFAIRS FOR STRIKING OFF - WHAT DO?
STRIKE-OFF NOTICE ISSUED BY ROC OFFICES
Recently ROCs in
India and particularly New Delhi ,
ROC issued Strike-Off Public Notice No-ROC-DEL/248/STK-5/2018/2912, dated
18.06.2018 to 31250 Companies, for not doing the Annual Compliance & Fillings.
WHAT STRIKE-OFF NOTICE SAYS?
According to the text
of the notice, “The Companies mentioned in the notice have not been carrying on
any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial
years and have not made any application within such period for obtaining the
status of dormant company under Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013, And,
therefore, proposes to remove/strike off the names of the mentioned companies
from the Register of companies and dissolve them unless a cause is shown to the
contrary, within thirty days from the date of this notice.
Any person objecting
to the proposed removal/striking off of name of the companies from the Register
of companies may send his/her objection to the office address mentioned here
above within thirty days from the date of publication of this notice.”
WHAT WE HAVE TO DO ?
So, according to the
Notice, first of all we have to decide whether we want to continue the company or not? whether
the Company was in operation, having transactions in the Books & Bank
Account of the Company, filed ITR or not?
THREE POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES AVAILABLE
·
After taking the decision of continuity of the Company, we will
find ourselves into either of these three (3) situations:
·
Company have business operation and wants to continue
further.
Or
·
Company do not have business operation but have future
business plans & hence wants to continue.
Or
·
Company do not have business operation, neither have any
future business plans & therefore wants to take exit suo-moto.
ACTION ONE
In Case Company
Have Business And Wants To Continue The Operation
In this case, Company shall file all the
pending Forms (AOC-4, MGT-7, ADT-1 (if any)), starting from the year filling
was not done till current year along with the additional fee i.e. 13 times of the original fee.
After completion of
the filling, the default of the Company becomes good and the Company would not
be Strike-off by the MCA.
ACTION TWO
In Case Company Do
Not Have Business But Wants To Continue For Future Business Plans
In this case also,
Company shall file all the pending Forms (AOC-4, MGT-7, ADT-1 (if any)), starting
from year the filling was not done till current year along with the additional
fee i.e. 13 times of the
original fee.
However, the Balance
sheets will be prepared accordingly and there should not have any transaction
in the Bank Account of the Company evidencing the business operation of the
Company. If books & bank account has such transactions then balance sheet
must disclose it. After completion of the filling the default of the Company becomes
good and the Company would not be Strike-off by the MCA.
ACTION THREE
In Case Company
Neither Have Business In Current, Nor Future Business Plans & Wants To
Strike-Off The Company
In this case, whether
the Company is in operation or not, it shall file all the pending
Forms (AOC-4, MGT-7, ADT-1 (if any)), starting from year the filling was not
done till current year along with the additional fee i.e. 13 times of the original fee.
Also, file Form STK-2 (with required Attachments &
fee of Rs. 5000/-).
After completion of
the filling the default of the Company becomes good and the Company gets
suo-moto Strike-off without any penalty.
Hence, these are the
way-outs available to the Companies appearing in the Notice of Strike-off,
depending upon their will.
Directors may opt for
any of the possible solutions and act accordingly within 30 days from the date of publication of the notice, to save the Company
from any penalty and trouble.
Possible Consequences for INACTION on the MCA Notice?
If, a Directors does
not take any action after receipt of this notice and remains silent then he/she
may possibly get into huge troubles. Likewise, earlier done in many Companies,
Directors may face one or more than one of following situations:
1.
Disqualification to act as
Director in any Company for a prescribed period or permanently.
2.
De-activation of Director
Identification Number (DIN).
3.
Deactivated DIN will lead to non-filling in other Companies, where the same person is
Director. It is a more
troublesome situation where the concerned director will be liable for
non-filling of other Companies as well.
4.
Directors may be personally liable for Penalty (if Central
Government so notifies).
5.
Directors will be debarred
to do business by incorporating a new entity.
Keeping the above
points in view, it is totally clear that Directors should not remain silent on
this notice.
They should take
action according to their requirement & will because additional fee on form filing is still better than huge
penalty and disqualification.
COURTESY : CS Deepika Shukla
But if all pending filling done in the month of January 2018,and then also we received notice in the month of July 2018 ,then what to do
ReplyDeleteAnd . director want to do bussiness
DeleteWell....in that case write a letter to ROC stating that the company has completed it's annual filing till date and attach the proofs ( Challans) along with the letter stating that the company proposes to continue it's business. And request the ROC not to strike off the name is the company from it's register
DeleteThe ROC on receipt of this reply with 30 days from the receipt of this Notice, would not take an action to strike off the name is the company.
Please find attach a link of a case law for your reference.
*NCLT (Delhi Bench) : In Three Star Properties (P.) Ltd. vs. Registrar of Companies*
*_Where the company, though not conducting business for two years, was regularly filing income tax returns for the relevant years, it can rightly contend that the company has been in operation when it was struck off the register._*
*_Read full caseaw at :_* https://dasgovernance.com/2018/06/24/nclt-delhi-bench-in-three-star-properties-p-ltd-vs-registrar-of-companies/
Hope this helps
Thanks
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete