SEBI IMPOSED FINE FOR NON-COMPLIANCES BY SREI ALTERNATIVE
INVESTMENT FUND UNDER SEBI AIF REGULATIONS.
In the case of
SREI Multiple Asset Investment Trust
SREI Alternative Investment Managers Limited
SEBI examined various compliance requirements including the
Know Your Client (KYC), due diligence norms etc. followed by the SREI Multiple
Asset Investment Trust- an Alternative Investment Fund.
It found the following violations by SREI AIF.
SEBI AIF Regulation 2 (1) (b)
|
―Alternative Investment
Fund‖ means any
fund established or
incorporated in India in
the form of
a trust or
a company or a limited
liability partnership or a
body corporate
|
SEBI AIF Regulation 7 (1) (a)
|
the Alternative Investment Fund shall abide by the
provisions of the Act and these regulations
|
SEBI AIF Regulation 7 (1) (b)
|
the
Alternative Investment Fund
shall not carry
on any other
activity other than permitted activities
|
SEBI AIF Regulation 10 (d)
|
The
Manager or Sponsor
shall have a
continuing interest in
the Alternative Investment Fund of not less than two and
half percent of the corpus or five crore rupees, whichever is lower, in the
form of investment in the Alternative
Investment Fund and such interest
shall not be through the waiver of management fees:
Provided that
for Category III Alternative Investment Fund, the continuing interest shall be
not less than five percent of the corpus or ten crore rupees, whichever is
lower.
|
SEBI AIF Regulation 15 (1) (c)
|
Category
I and II
Alternative Investment Funds
shall invest not
more than twenty five percent of the [investable
funds] in one Investee Company;
|
It was alleged that the Noticees
had used the amount contributed by the investors for the purpose of giving
loans to the various companies instead of investing the same as per definition of ‘Alternative
investment Fund” prescribed under regulation 2(1) (b) of AIF Regulations
and therefore allegedly
violated regulation 2 (1) (b) which is produced as under;
2 (1) (b) “Alternative Investment
Fund” means any fund established or incorporated in India in the form of a
trust or a company or a limited liability partnership or a body corporate
which,-
(i)
is a privately pooled investment vehicle which
collects funds from investors, whether Indian or foreign, for investing it in
accordance with a defined investment policy for the benefit of its investors;
Allegation of Non-Compliance of
Investment Conditions
That an amount to the extent of `
1,352 crores (Capital + profit) was received by IGOF on June 29, 2015 on
account of repayment of loans from the borrowers; and out of the same, capital
to the extent of ` 470 crores and profit of ` 35 crores was distributed to the
investors and the balance amount was used to acquire loan assets from SREI
Infrastructure Finance Ltd.
Allegation of regulation 15 (1) (c)
of AIF Regulations
It was alleged that that the
Noticees at two occasions had invested in Investee Company of more than 25% of
the total investible funds collected from the investors in violation of
regulation 15 (1) (c) of AIF Regulations.
Allegation of Non -
Compliance of Investment Committee’s Decision and Failure in following
Investment Strategy specified in Private Placement Memorandum.
Allegation of Failure
in Keeping Continuing Interest by Sponsor / Manager
ISSUE
1) Whether the Noticees had used the amount contributed by the investors for
the purpose of giving loans to the various companies instead of investing the
same as per definition of ‘Alternative investment Fund” prescribed under
regulation 2(1) (b) of AIF Regulations?
2) Whether the Noticees had invested in Investee Company more than 25% of
the total investible funds collected from the investors in violation of
regulation 15 (1) (c) of AIF Regulations?
3) Whether the Noticees had not acted in accordance with the decisions of
the IC and also not followed the investment strategy as specified in the PPM in
respect of amount of portfolio investment? If yes, then whether the same is in
violation of SEBI Circular No. CIR/IMD/DF/7/2/015 dated October 01, 2015?
4) Whether the Noticee(s) / Sponsor or Manager had failed to maintain
specified continuing interest as per regulation 10(d) of AIF Regulations?
5) Whether the aforesaid violations/failure, if any, on the part of the
Noticees, would attract monetary penalty under section 15 HB of the SEBI Act?
AND If yes, then, what would be the monetary penalty that can be imposed upon
the Noticees taking into consideration the factors stipulated in section 15J of
the SEBI Act read with rule 5 (2) of the Adjudication Rules?
FINAL ORDER OF THE SEBI WITH PENALTY
Name of the Noticee
|
Amount of Penalty
|
Penalty Provisions and
Violations
|
SREI Multiple Asset Investment Trust (Noticee No.1)
|
Rs 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh only) The Noticees shall be liable to
pay the penalty jointly and severally.
|
Under section 15 HB of the SEBI Act for violation of regulation 15
(1) (c) of AIF Regulations.
|
SREI Alternative Investment Managers Limited (Noticee No. 2)
|
Rs 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh only) The Noticees shall be liable to
pay the penalty jointly and severally.
|
Under section 15 HB of the SEBI Act for violation of regulation 10(d)
of AIF Regulations.
|
Rs 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh only) The Noticees shall be liable to
pay the penalty jointly and severally.
|
Under section 15 HB of the SEBI Act for violation of SEBI Circular
No. CIR/IMD/DF/7/2/015 dated October 01, 2015.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment